BREAKING NEWS: The nation is stunned after a high ranking FBI official has come forward with the truth about former President Barack Obama that could lead to legal action. Back in October, FBI informant Douglas Campbell came forward to say that there was “on-the-record quid pro quo” surrounding the Uranium One scandal with the Clintons. On Wednesday night, his lawyer spoke out to drop a bomb about Barack Obama that is sure to send the former president into panic mode.
The Gateway Pundit reported that Campbell previously said that Bill Clinton was given a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian-backed bank and that the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars from people involved with the Uranium One deal. On Wednesday, he spoke with four Congressional panels about the Uranium One scandal.
Hours later, Campbell’s lawyer Victoria Toensing spoke with Sean Hannity on Fox News.
“Mr. Campbell was told by the FBI that what he was being told and they were taking it upstairs and he was also told that President Obama also had it in his daily briefing twice,” Toensing said.
Campbell has also claimed that the Obama administration made decisions that ended up benefitting the Russian nuclear industry, which he said was seeking to build a monopoly in the global uranium market. Obama himself was briefed on the Uranium One scandal at least twice, yet he did nothing about it.
The Hill reported that during his testimony, Campbell said that Russian nuclear officials “told me at various times that they expected APCO to apply a portion of the $3 million annual lobbying fee it was receiving from the Russians to provide in-kind support for the Clinton’s Global Initiative.”
“The contract called for four payments of $750,000 over twelve months,” he added. “APCO was expected to give assistance free of charge to the Clinton Global Initiative as part of their effort to create a favorable environment to ensure the Obama administration made affirmative decisions on everything from Uranium One to the U.S.-Russia Civilian Nuclear Cooperation agreement.”
What do you think about this? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.